RESEARCH COMMONS
LIBRARY

Compatibility Of Urban Edible Landscaping To The Sustainable Sites Initiative's Goals And Design Criteria.

ResearchCommons/Manakin Repository

Compatibility Of Urban Edible Landscaping To The Sustainable Sites Initiative's Goals And Design Criteria.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Beesley, Cheryl en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2011-03-03T21:51:38Z
dc.date.available 2011-03-03T21:51:38Z
dc.date.issued 2011-03-03
dc.date.submitted January 2010 en_US
dc.identifier.other DISS-10947 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10106/5434
dc.description.abstract This research addresses edible landscapes through the lens of The Sustainable Sites Initiative (SITES). The Sustainable Sites Initiative is a collaboration of the American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA), The Ladybird Johnson Wildlife Center and the United States Botanic Garden. The team of professionals working on SITES has developed a manual for sustainable site development and landscaping practice that include guidelines regarding site development, installation, and maintenance practices. Various levels of certification can be obtained by accumulating points in categories that relate to new site construction or site renovation. It is the purpose of this thesis to research how urban edible landscaping may or may not fit into the SITES point criteria. The Sustainable Sites Initiative includes criteria for sustainable site development in the areas of water conservation, fuel conservation, lessening toxic pollutants entering water, soil and air, and conservation of existing topsoil. Most of these criteria are affected to some degree by edible landscaping in urban areas. This thesis uses three methods to evaluate the compatibility of urban edible landscaping for SITES point criteria. First, SITES guidelines are analyzed to determine if there are any direct conflicts regarding edible urban landscapes. Secondly, interviews with design professionals who have been associated with the development of the SITES Guidelines and Benchmarks are compared and analyzed for common thoughts and opinions regarding compatibility of edible landscapes with SITES certification. Finally, a case study of The Olive Tree Learning Center, an edible landscape in Austin, Texas, is evaluated for compatibility and possible point accumulation using the criteria of the Sustainable Sites Initiative Benchmarks and Guidelines, 2009. Evaluation of the interviews, SITES' criteria and the application of this evaluation to the Olive Tree Learning Center reveals no direct conflict with edible landscapes and the SITES prerequisites and credits; however, certain credits are more well-suited for point accumulation. Charts that rate probable point accumulations are for each section of SITES are in located in Chapter 5. These point accumulations are based on the research in this study; however, they are subjective, and will vary widely from site to site according to a particular site's variables regarding site selection, construction and maintenance. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Hopman, David en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Landscape Architecture en_US
dc.title Compatibility Of Urban Edible Landscaping To The Sustainable Sites Initiative's Goals And Design Criteria. en_US
dc.type M.L.A. en_US
dc.contributor.committeeChair Hopman, David en_US
dc.degree.department Landscape Architecture en_US
dc.degree.discipline Landscape Architecture en_US
dc.degree.grantor University of Texas at Arlington en_US
dc.degree.level masters en_US
dc.degree.name M.L.A. en_US

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Beesley_uta_2502M_10947.pdf 2.561Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Browse

My Account

Statistics

About Us