RESEARCH COMMONS
LIBRARY

Quantitative Comparison Of Two Approaches To Agent Cooperation

ResearchCommons/Manakin Repository

Quantitative Comparison Of Two Approaches To Agent Cooperation

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Espino, Jose Ramon en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2007-08-23T01:56:13Z
dc.date.available 2007-08-23T01:56:13Z
dc.date.issued 2007-08-23T01:56:13Z
dc.date.submitted August 2005 en_US
dc.identifier.other DISS-1087 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10106/182
dc.description.abstract Multi-agent systems (MASs) are characterized by collections of autonomous agents that interact with each other in simple ways, but the collection of agents as a whole is characterized by emergent behavior (EB) which will have properties that individual agents do not. Engineers want to design artificial MASs for a variety of reasons including military operations. The idea is for the EB to be carrying out the mission itself. In this scenario, the agents are relatively inexpensive and expendable. A large body of work exists in MAS research for military applications and a variety of different designs have been proposed. Because there is no uniform framework for communicating quantitative research results dealing with agent cooperation, it is difficult for engineers to make well-informed design decisions. We demonstrate an example of how to qualitatively and more importantly, quantitatively compare two approaches to agent cooperation. The example includes a formal experiment design and data analysis. Our example MAS deals with cooperative suppression of enemy air defense (C-SEAD). We consider two approaches to agent cooperation: state-based and Artificial Physics (AP). In this case, our example indicates that the state-based approach is better. In the corpus of research work, ideas for mobile robot MAS cooperative control, etc. are usually “validated” by simple, ad hoc simulations. We are not convinced these simulations actually validate the ideas proposed because they lack an appreciation of system-level constraints. E.g., you cannot engineer an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) that has three-hour endurance yet weighs less than one pound—there is no viable source of power that can do that. If one is engineering a MAS for the real-world, we think the validation of each candidate design requires high-fidelity simulation of all important aspects of the MAS—movement, communication, resource consumption, etc. This thesis demonstrates the need for such simulations. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Reyes, Alexander A. en_US
dc.language.iso EN en_US
dc.publisher Computer Science & Engineering en_US
dc.title Quantitative Comparison Of Two Approaches To Agent Cooperation en_US
dc.type M.S. en_US
dc.contributor.committeeChair Reyes, Alexander A. en_US
dc.degree.department Computer Science & Engineering en_US
dc.degree.discipline Computer Science & Engineering en_US
dc.degree.grantor University of Texas at Arlington en_US
dc.degree.level masters en_US
dc.degree.name M.S. en_US

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
umi-uta-1087.pdf 805.1Kb PDF View/Open
805.1Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Browse

My Account

Statistics

About Us