RESEARCH COMMONS
LIBRARY

On-road Measurement Of NOx And CO₂ Emissions From Biodiesel Produced From Different Feedstocks

ResearchCommons/Manakin Repository

On-road Measurement Of NOx And CO₂ Emissions From Biodiesel Produced From Different Feedstocks

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Pala-en, Natchanok en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2012-07-25T19:08:53Z
dc.date.available 2012-07-25T19:08:53Z
dc.date.issued 2012-07-25
dc.date.submitted January 2012 en_US
dc.identifier.other DISS-11625 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10106/11063
dc.description.abstract Biodiesel has generated increased interest in the US and elsewhere recently as an alternative to petroleum-derived diesel. Because it can be produced from domestic feedstocks such as soybeans, canola oil, and even recycled cooking oil, biodiesel can help reduce dependence on foreign petroleum. Due to its high oxygen content, biodiesel typically burns more completely than petroleum diesel, and thus has lower emissions of hydrocarbons (HC), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulate matter (PM). However, biodiesel may increase or decrease nitrogen oxide (NOx) and carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions, depending on engine type, test cycle, and biodiesel feedstock. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare emissions from biodiesel blend 20% (B20) made from various feedstocks, in an on-road setting using a portable emissions measurement system (PEMS) and a chassis dynamometer setting for a test vehicle (1994 Chevy Silverado). The study tested 4 biodiesel feedstocks (soybean oil, canola oil, waste cooking oil, and animal fat) compared with ultra low sulfur diesel (ULSD) using on-road testing under real-world driving conditions with a Horiba On-Board Measurement System OBS-1300 on a highway route and arterial route, and chassis dynamometer with Urban Dynamometer Drive Schedule. Emissions of NOx and CO₂ were measured second-by-second and compared for each feedstock with ULSD. For the dynamometer only, HC, CO, and PM were also measured. Biodiesel fuel specifications from each feedstock were tested and compared. The dynamometer test results showed statistically significant lower emissions of HC, CO, and PM from all B20 blends compared to ULSD. For CO₂, on-road testing (arterial, highway, and idling) and dynamometer testing showed no statistically significant difference in emissions among the B20 blends and ULSD. For NOx, dynamometer testing showed only B20 from soybean oil to have statistically significant higher emissions. This is generally consistent with the on-road testing (arterial, highway, and idling), which showed no statistically significant difference in NOx emissions between ULSD and the B20 blends. The results above are specific to the 1994 Chevy Silverado tested, and cannot be generalized to other vehicles. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Sattler, Melanie en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Environmental & Earth Science en_US
dc.title On-road Measurement Of NOx And CO₂ Emissions From Biodiesel Produced From Different Feedstocks en_US
dc.type Ph.D. en_US
dc.contributor.committeeChair Sattler, Melanie en_US
dc.degree.department Environmental & Earth Science en_US
dc.degree.discipline Environmental & Earth Science en_US
dc.degree.grantor University of Texas at Arlington en_US
dc.degree.level doctoral en_US
dc.degree.name Ph.D. en_US

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
PalaEn_uta_2502D_11625.pdf 3.865Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Browse

My Account

Statistics

About Us